Monday, April 10th 2017
The Suez crisis, unrest in Poland, and the Hungarian uprising “dominated the international news” in 1956. This review of U.S. broadcasting at the time noted “in terms of international communications, the most important was the Hungarian uprising.” The authors counseled that “If policy is unclear, the audience may misperceive it even when operators do not. Reactions may be harmful to the interests of both the communicator and the receivers.”
Article: Foreign Policy and Communications During the Hungarian UprisingRead More
Tuesday, November 8th 2016
“Putin has borrowed a page from America’s Cold War playbook and seeks to expose the rot within the West, and especially within the United States, as a means of destroying Western cohesion, diminishing American influence and leadership, and reinforcing Russia. The means employed by Russia are modern, including hacking and cyber-espionage, but, at its core, this is an influence operation of the kind embraced by the United States in the first decade of the Cold War.”
Headline: The Russians Read our Cold War PlaybookRead More
Sunday, October 30th 2016
A new report from the Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), The Kremlin Playbook by Heather A. Conley, James Mina, Ruslan Stefanov, and Martin Vladimirov, reframes Russian influence in Central and Eastern Europe.
According to the four scholars, “. . . Russia has cultivated an opaque web of economic and political patronage across the region that the Kremlin uses to influence and direct decisionmaking. This web resembles a network-flow model—or “unvirtuous circle”—which the Kremlin can use to influence (if not control) critical state institutions, bodies, and economies, as well as shape national policies and decisions that serve its interests while actively discrediting the Western liberal democratic system.”
Although the media and Russian disinformation are mentioned only briefly, the report demonstrates how they fit into a larger Russian design.
Finally, the report’s recommendation that assistance programs focus on “maintaining and strengthening investigative journalism and independence of the media environment” should be highly suggestive for U.S. Public Diplomacy, exchanges, and international broadcasting.
Headline: The Kremlin Playbook
Subhead: Understanding Russian Influence in Central and Eastern EuropeRead More
Thursday, October 13th 2016
We are excited to invite you to submit your photographs for display in the Public Diplomacy Council’s 2017 photographic exhibition, Images of Public Diplomacy: Ideas, Experiences, Relationships.Read More
Sunday, October 9th 2016
In September, 2016, the Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security of the Atlantic Council published a report The Future of the Army: Today, Tomorrow, and the Day after Tomorrow by retired Army Lieutenant General David Barno and Nora Bensahel, Distinguished Scholar-in-Residence at American University’s School of International Service.
The two bluntly assessed national security challenges in the near, medium, and long term. Shaping the Army and its overseas basing and logistics postures to meet these challenges will no doubt require substantial collaboration with the Department of State.
There are, however, no mentions of “diplomacy,” “diplomatic,” “public affairs,” “public relations,” or “civil affairs” in the report.
Neither are there mentions of “information operations,” “international development,” “disinformation,” “propaganda,” or “stabilization.” There is a single glancing mention of “interagency.”Read More